The 11th session of Hamid Nouri's appeals court was held while his lawyers revealed an illegal and shocking incident in the investigation process of the case.

Meezan News Agency - Judiciary Media Center - The 11th hearing of the appeal court of Hamid Nouri, an Iranian citizen detained in Sweden, was held on Monday, June 8. In this court session, Hamid Nouri's Swedish lawyers, "Thomas Bodstrom" and "Hannah Larson", defended him and protested some strange events in the case. "Bodstrom" said at the beginning of his statement: "When talking about murder, there are many questions and we must have valid documents, but in this case, there is no evidence that has been proven to show that Hamid Nouri did this." Nouri did not commit any murder and had nothing to do with the issues that happened around him. Recording of Hamid Nouri's documents and continued harassment Nouri's lawyer said: Nouri's tablet, which contains his defense, was confiscated twice, and if he wants to use his tablet, he must apply again. Of course, he requests every day and they either give a negative answer or give little time to use the tablet, and in some cases they don't give time at all. He added: We are given different answers from the detention center, they have placed another person in Hamid Nouri's cell and they claim that by doing this they have ended his isolation, but Hamid Nouri cannot speak a single word to this person. The difference that has been made is that someone is added to the same room and the same conditions and does not allow any light to focus on the case and self-defense. The psychological game of the Swedes to prevent Nouri from meeting his lawyers According to Nouri's lawyers, the Swedes are using various ways to harass Hamid Nouri, including preventing him from meeting with his lawyers. According to the lawyer, a month ago when Nouri wanted to see his lawyer, he was transferred from Solentona detention center to Kronoberg, and when the lawyer went to see him, he found out that Nouri was returned to Solentona! Meanwhile, when Nouri returned to the previous detention center, a new permit had to be obtained for the visit. According to "Bodström", the authorities of the detention center had also told Nouri's Iranian lawyer that he had permission to meet with Nouri, but this claim was also not true and despite traveling to Stockholm, the Iranian lawyer failed to meet with him and returned to Iran. Lawyer Hamid Nouri further said: When a person is isolated for so long, this in itself is an example of torture. He emphasized: Hamid Nouri did not have the opportunity to attend a fair court and the parties in the case did not have equal rights. Interrogation and secret and parallel police investigation of Hamid Nouri "Bodstrom" continued his statements and revealed a strange event during the trial and arrest of Hamid Nouri. He said that the lawyers were shocked by this. Nouri's lawyer stated that he found out about this issue during a TV interview regarding Nouri's case According to the statements of Swedish lawyer Hamid Nouri, a person from the Swedish police with a secret identity illegally interrogated Hamid Nouri. This person approached Hamid Nouri and secretly obtained information from Nouri without revealing his identity. Lawyer Hamid Nouri mentioned a person named "Omid" whose uncle was allegedly executed in Iran in the 60s. This person was working for the police and had met with Hamid Nouri and talked to him about his identity and real purpose without Hamid Nouri's knowledge. Bodstrom said: This person's name is Omid and he works as a policeman; This person met Hamid Nouri every week According to Bodstrom, Amid conducted a parallel investigation that was and still is secret. "Hope" seeks to deceive and gain the trust of Hamid Nouri He emphasized: We are facing two types of investigations in the court; One is an official investigation and the other is an investigation that the police conducted and planned at the same time He secretly gained the trust of Hamid Nouri in the hope that he was of Iranian origin and approached him; This research was secret for us and we should have known about it. Hana Larson, Hamid Nouri's other lawyer, said: This person (Omid) cooperated well with the prosecutor and we are shocked by this. We want the notes related to the meetings of this person with Hamid Nouri, if the interrogation was conducted, we want its content, the police came and talked to the main accused in the case, and we want the content of these conversations. We were not aware of this parallel interrogation and no one was present in these meetings. Larson added: Why did this person interrogate Hamid Nouri without Nouri knowing who he is and what his true identity is? How did this person have constant access to Mr. Nouri when Nouri's family was not allowed to meet him? What role did this person play? This person said that he was in close contact with Hamid Nouri in this case, according to the description of the events given by the prosecutor, "Omid" cooperated with the prosecutor. Violation of court impartiality Hamid Nouri's lawyer further said: The police (Omid) says that Hamid Nouri executed his uncle; This violation of impartiality in the court process has no precedent and is considered a violation of impartiality. We want to know whether the prosecutor and the trial court were aware of this investigation. Hamid Nouri was not aware of the matter when he was talking to this person. He emphasized: We must allow a fair trial to be held. Now the possibility of holding a fair trial has been lost, they have extracted items from Hamid Nouri's mobile phone and Omid was involved in these items. In the short time we had since yesterday, we realized that they did not provide all the materials and a selection of them was provided. "Larson", said the person who made the content It was this hope that he chose. This person has "curated" content and has obviously removed a large amount of content; We cannot trust the actions that Omid has taken, it is impossible for Hamid Nouri to defend himself with this situation, he was deceived, the prisons administration destroyed Hamid Nouri's materials and the prosecutor only presented his own materials. The proceedings should end with these conditions and Hamid Nouri should be acquitted.

Tuesday 2023/05/30 | 21:54:18

117

The 11th session of Hamid Nouri's appeals court was held while his lawyers revealed an illegal and shocking incident in the investigation process of the case.

Meezan News Agency - Judiciary Media Center - The 11th hearing of the appeal court of Hamid Nouri, an Iranian citizen detained in Sweden, was held on Monday, June 8. In this court session, Hamid Nouri's Swedish lawyers, "Thomas Bodstrom" and "Hannah Larson", defended him and protested some strange events in the case. "Bodstrom" said at the beginning of his statement: "When talking about murder, there are many questions and we must have valid documents, but in this case, there is no evidence that has been proven to show that Hamid Nouri did this." Nouri did not commit any murder and had nothing to do with the issues that happened around him. Recording of Hamid Nouri's documents and continued harassment Nouri's lawyer said: Nouri's tablet, which contains his defense, was confiscated twice, and if he wants to use his tablet, he must apply again. Of course, he requests every day and they either give a negative answer or give little time to use the tablet, and in some cases they don't give time at all. He added: We are given different answers from the detention center, they have placed another person in Hamid Nouri's cell and they claim that by doing this they have ended his isolation, but Hamid Nouri cannot speak a single word to this person. The difference that has been made is that someone is added to the same room and the same conditions and does not allow any light to focus on the case and self-defense. The psychological game of the Swedes to prevent Nouri from meeting his lawyers According to Nouri's lawyers, the Swedes are using various ways to harass Hamid Nouri, including preventing him from meeting with his lawyers. According to the lawyer, a month ago when Nouri wanted to see his lawyer, he was transferred from Solentona detention center to Kronoberg, and when the lawyer went to see him, he found out that Nouri was returned to Solentona! Meanwhile, when Nouri returned to the previous detention center, a new permit had to be obtained for the visit. According to "Bodström", the authorities of the detention center had also told Nouri's Iranian lawyer that he had permission to meet with Nouri, but this claim was also not true and despite traveling to Stockholm, the Iranian lawyer failed to meet with him and returned to Iran. Lawyer Hamid Nouri further said: When a person is isolated for so long, this in itself is an example of torture. He emphasized: Hamid Nouri did not have the opportunity to attend a fair court and the parties in the case did not have equal rights. Interrogation and secret and parallel police investigation of Hamid Nouri "Bodstrom" continued his statements and revealed a strange event during the trial and arrest of Hamid Nouri. He said that the lawyers were shocked by this. Nouri's lawyer stated that he found out about this issue during a TV interview regarding Nouri's case According to the statements of Swedish lawyer Hamid Nouri, a person from the Swedish police with a secret identity illegally interrogated Hamid Nouri. This person approached Hamid Nouri and secretly obtained information from Nouri without revealing his identity. Lawyer Hamid Nouri mentioned a person named "Omid" whose uncle was allegedly executed in Iran in the 60s. This person was working for the police and had met with Hamid Nouri and talked to him about his identity and real purpose without Hamid Nouri's knowledge. Bodstrom said: This person's name is Omid and he works as a policeman; This person met Hamid Nouri every week According to Bodstrom, Amid conducted a parallel investigation that was and still is secret. "Hope" seeks to deceive and gain the trust of Hamid Nouri He emphasized: We are facing two types of investigations in the court; One is an official investigation and the other is an investigation that the police conducted and planned at the same time He secretly gained the trust of Hamid Nouri in the hope that he was of Iranian origin and approached him; This research was secret for us and we should have known about it. Hana Larson, Hamid Nouri's other lawyer, said: This person (Omid) cooperated well with the prosecutor and we are shocked by this. We want the notes related to the meetings of this person with Hamid Nouri, if the interrogation was conducted, we want its content, the police came and talked to the main accused in the case, and we want the content of these conversations. We were not aware of this parallel interrogation and no one was present in these meetings. Larson added: Why did this person interrogate Hamid Nouri without Nouri knowing who he is and what his true identity is? How did this person have constant access to Mr. Nouri when Nouri's family was not allowed to meet him? What role did this person play? This person said that he was in close contact with Hamid Nouri in this case, according to the description of the events given by the prosecutor, "Omid" cooperated with the prosecutor. Violation of court impartiality Hamid Nouri's lawyer further said: The police (Omid) says that Hamid Nouri executed his uncle; This violation of impartiality in the court process has no precedent and is considered a violation of impartiality. We want to know whether the prosecutor and the trial court were aware of this investigation. Hamid Nouri was not aware of the matter when he was talking to this person. He emphasized: We must allow a fair trial to be held. Now the possibility of holding a fair trial has been lost, they have extracted items from Hamid Nouri's mobile phone and Omid was involved in these items. In the short time we had since yesterday, we realized that they did not provide all the materials and a selection of them was provided. "Larson", said the person who made the content It was this hope that he chose. This person has "curated" content and has obviously removed a large amount of content; We cannot trust the actions that Omid has taken, it is impossible for Hamid Nouri to defend himself with this situation, he was deceived, the prisons administration destroyed Hamid Nouri's materials and the prosecutor only presented his own materials. The proceedings should end with these conditions and Hamid Nouri should be acquitted.

Tuesday 2023/05/30 | 21:54:18

117